Keep the Creep On the Sexual Offenders' List
A former Vancouver Island doctor who was convicted of sexually assaulting patients and served four years for it, has managed to get a little privileged treatment for himself. Having your name on Canada's registry of convicted perverts for a minimum 20 years is supposed to follow conviction, for everyone. This 63-year-old serial offender has, however, managed to worm his way out of having his name on the list. At the moment, he is being identified only as "S". Do you think that stand for "Sexual Predator"?
Apparently, he argued successfully in the B.C Supreme Court that it would be a significant violation of his privacy to be treated like all the others of his kind. This creep has returned to the neighbourhood where he enjoyed trampling on the rights of others and is now wanting to find work. A brother-in-law is currently paying him a pay cheque, but the good doctor wants to be able to find employment elsewhere. His justification for his demands are the psychological tests that declare him an unlikely repeat offender.
Excuse me? He is already described as a "serial offender". These criminals prey on others weaker than themselves. As soon as they do such a thing, the law should regard them as having willingly declared that they waive any rights of their own. How can you quantify what hells some of his victims are going to be condemned to for years and years? What difference does it make if his supposed privacy is infringed upon? He is garbage; walking refuse. Since when do we carefully safeguard the privacy of waste matter? Justice Catherine Bruce is the idiot who accepted the sex offender's arguments that there would be no public interest served by keeping his name on the list for what could amount to the rest of his life. In other words, he played up the "poor little old man" angle and she fell for it. She obviously did not ask herself who there was to play up the poor unsuspecting victim angle for those patients he abused from his position of trust.
How wonderful it would be if both he and the judge who decreed that his name should be taken off the list were suddenly to find themselves driven mad by nightmares that will not go away, no matter what recourse they seek. Nightmares that strike as soon as they close their eyes every single night for the rest of their lives, in spite of all the best doctors' efforts, would be only fitting reward for these two. It might help them gain a better understanding of the rights of others.
Apparently, he argued successfully in the B.C Supreme Court that it would be a significant violation of his privacy to be treated like all the others of his kind. This creep has returned to the neighbourhood where he enjoyed trampling on the rights of others and is now wanting to find work. A brother-in-law is currently paying him a pay cheque, but the good doctor wants to be able to find employment elsewhere. His justification for his demands are the psychological tests that declare him an unlikely repeat offender.
Excuse me? He is already described as a "serial offender". These criminals prey on others weaker than themselves. As soon as they do such a thing, the law should regard them as having willingly declared that they waive any rights of their own. How can you quantify what hells some of his victims are going to be condemned to for years and years? What difference does it make if his supposed privacy is infringed upon? He is garbage; walking refuse. Since when do we carefully safeguard the privacy of waste matter? Justice Catherine Bruce is the idiot who accepted the sex offender's arguments that there would be no public interest served by keeping his name on the list for what could amount to the rest of his life. In other words, he played up the "poor little old man" angle and she fell for it. She obviously did not ask herself who there was to play up the poor unsuspecting victim angle for those patients he abused from his position of trust.
How wonderful it would be if both he and the judge who decreed that his name should be taken off the list were suddenly to find themselves driven mad by nightmares that will not go away, no matter what recourse they seek. Nightmares that strike as soon as they close their eyes every single night for the rest of their lives, in spite of all the best doctors' efforts, would be only fitting reward for these two. It might help them gain a better understanding of the rights of others.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home