The Baby's Too Dark?
Thomas and Nancy Andrews of Commack New York are suing the Manhattan Clinic, New York Medical Services for Reproductive Medicine, claiming the clinic screwed up. DNA tests confirmed that Thomas ain't the papa, and now they've got their knickers in a knot because they are forced (forced?) to raise a child who isn't "the same race, nationality. colour" as they are. Apparently the couple are trying to claim they love the baby, but "are reminded of this terrible mistake each and every time (they) look at her".
My question is, did they actually want a baby, or not? I would assume if they were dealing with a fertility clinic then there was some kind of problem interfering with their creating offspring in the usual way. They went to this clinic because they wanted a baby more than anything else in the world, didn't they? The answer to that one might not necessarily be affirmative. They were perhaps looking for a status symbol, a baby to have simply because "that's what you do" and they didn't want to fall behind the Jones family in meeting societally approved milestones along the status quo freeway.
It would seem to me that if they really did love the baby, they would look at her and see a little treasure; a little princess each and every time they looked at her. Instead they say themselves that they look at her and see a mistake. What the hell kind of a family is that to foist on the poor innocent who has had the great misfortune to be born to these two mean-minded whiners?
Maybe what they are actually seeing when they look at the little one is a chance to make some money off her existence, to use her like a cash-cow. Maybe the judge who is allowing this case should also be looking for new parents for the wee one. The ones she has now do not sound like the ones she deserves. Simply by right of her birth, she is deserving of love and respect. Parents who look at their baby and see a mistake neither love nor respect the life they are responsible for bringing into this world. No matter whose sperm the clinic used, the Andrews are ultimately the ones responsible for this baby's existence. The clinic would not have had or used eggs from this woman if she had not voluntarily given them and then okayed their being fertilized.
If the clinic did use another man's sperm to impregnate Nancy Andrews, and they just can't get over that, then they should not be the ones to raise the baby. Either shit or get off the pot, people. You went to a fertility clinic in order to conceive. How many women go that route and still come away with empty arms? How many unhappy women, lacking the money necessary to pay for the services of such a clinic, are left with empty arms?
Ms Andrews came away from that clinic with an armful of baby to love, and she's suing because the baby isn't the colour she needs it to be before she can love it. Life's a bitch.
My question is, did they actually want a baby, or not? I would assume if they were dealing with a fertility clinic then there was some kind of problem interfering with their creating offspring in the usual way. They went to this clinic because they wanted a baby more than anything else in the world, didn't they? The answer to that one might not necessarily be affirmative. They were perhaps looking for a status symbol, a baby to have simply because "that's what you do" and they didn't want to fall behind the Jones family in meeting societally approved milestones along the status quo freeway.
It would seem to me that if they really did love the baby, they would look at her and see a little treasure; a little princess each and every time they looked at her. Instead they say themselves that they look at her and see a mistake. What the hell kind of a family is that to foist on the poor innocent who has had the great misfortune to be born to these two mean-minded whiners?
Maybe what they are actually seeing when they look at the little one is a chance to make some money off her existence, to use her like a cash-cow. Maybe the judge who is allowing this case should also be looking for new parents for the wee one. The ones she has now do not sound like the ones she deserves. Simply by right of her birth, she is deserving of love and respect. Parents who look at their baby and see a mistake neither love nor respect the life they are responsible for bringing into this world. No matter whose sperm the clinic used, the Andrews are ultimately the ones responsible for this baby's existence. The clinic would not have had or used eggs from this woman if she had not voluntarily given them and then okayed their being fertilized.
If the clinic did use another man's sperm to impregnate Nancy Andrews, and they just can't get over that, then they should not be the ones to raise the baby. Either shit or get off the pot, people. You went to a fertility clinic in order to conceive. How many women go that route and still come away with empty arms? How many unhappy women, lacking the money necessary to pay for the services of such a clinic, are left with empty arms?
Ms Andrews came away from that clinic with an armful of baby to love, and she's suing because the baby isn't the colour she needs it to be before she can love it. Life's a bitch.
1 Comments:
That kid should no longer be with the Andrews losers. Can you imagine the kid growing up in that environment? If they really want a child that is made from their sperm and egg ... they could just try again.
Post a Comment
<< Home