Use a Moniker, Buddy
It seems someone went wandering through my archives and found my entry about Teilhard technologies, and their patent on a "SYSTEM FOR TRANSFORMING AND EXCHANGING DATA BETWEEN DISTRIBUTED HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTER SYSTEMS". I was a little less than overawed by the corp. and its patent, and said so. I purposely indulged in a little misuse of the Queen's English to express my scorn. Obviously upset by my lack of respect for the great Teilhard, Mr. or Ms Courage-of-their-Convictions left the scathing retort quoted below, as a verbal slap on the wrist for me, and signed it "anonymous"
At 4:16 PM, November 21, 2005, Anonymous said...
RTFP. Cdn Patent 2,241,767 is for integration of legacy data and does not cover inter-office memos. I realize limited mental capacity (and perhaps even a proper relationship with english) can be a barrier to understanding the rather obtuse language of patents. However, one should nevertheless control the urge to engage in a tenuous criticism of something without the the necessary foundations for understanding.
I have less respect for the "anonymous" blowhards of the world than I do for a fresh pile of horseshit. At least the aforementioned excreta can be put to good use as fertilizer, and that's not tenuous criticism, either. That's right in your face, fullblown objurgation. But wait! What if my response is worded a wee bit too obtusely for my anonymous friend? Let me stretch my "limited mental capacity" to more clearly phrase my response to you, Mr/Ms Anonymous.
Fuck you.
At 4:16 PM, November 21, 2005, Anonymous said...
RTFP. Cdn Patent 2,241,767 is for integration of legacy data and does not cover inter-office memos. I realize limited mental capacity (and perhaps even a proper relationship with english) can be a barrier to understanding the rather obtuse language of patents. However, one should nevertheless control the urge to engage in a tenuous criticism of something without the the necessary foundations for understanding.
I have less respect for the "anonymous" blowhards of the world than I do for a fresh pile of horseshit. At least the aforementioned excreta can be put to good use as fertilizer, and that's not tenuous criticism, either. That's right in your face, fullblown objurgation. But wait! What if my response is worded a wee bit too obtusely for my anonymous friend? Let me stretch my "limited mental capacity" to more clearly phrase my response to you, Mr/Ms Anonymous.
Fuck you.
6 Comments:
Good response.
Although it doesn't take a stretch of the imagination to point out how incredibly wrong your anonymous is. Legacy data for one can be extended to capture inter-office memos.
Anyway, Teilhard is stupid company trying to make money off the backs of others labour. The integration methods that they've described is widely used in ETL implementations by many vendors. What has Teilhard ever produce? Nothing, other than a patent application and lawyers.
Good response. Now let's hope Mr./Mrs. anonymous does not have too limited of a mental capacity to understand it.
You found a thesaurus!!
Ha! Thesaurus! The one-liner comeback from those with a limited vocabulary!
I love it. This is what happens when little brains encounter big brains.
One line was all it was worth
peace and love
OK numb nuts. Perhaps you should should send youjr intelligent remarks to ORACLE and there team of lawyers. Being a tiny company like ORACLE their team should've asked you for advice before caving on the lawsuit they (Oracle) initiated before the courts found they were infringing on Tielhards patents. And maybe if they had heard from you sooner they wouldn't have agreed to a big cash settlement either. Geez, where were you when they needed you. With all the dough Oracle has you'd think they coul've hired better lawyers eh? Get a life ya little geek, I bet you love dazzling yourself with pissant vebage and seeing what you wrote on the internet huh big fella?
Post a Comment
<< Home