Yeah, OK, so I'm just a little wee bit late with these two, but, here goes.
I just found this out. Have you heard about it? Apparently, in May, the Swediah army "lost" 3,199 pairs of green camouflage underpants! I kid thee not. You have to wonder about a couple of things here ... Exactly how were these items 'lost'? Were they stolen? I can't quite imagine a high black market demand for 'hot' camouflage drawers. I wonder what the going price is? Finally, the big question is, WHY does the underwear have to be camouflage? Is this for midnight manoeuvres?
Alberta premier Ralph Klein apparently launched into fervent defense of Augusto Pinochet recently in the legislature, and then tabled a university essay he had written about the Chilean. (What the hell was that about? Was he hoping the Speaker would put a little gold sticker on it, maybe?) Whatever, academics immediately crawled all over it and found that large parts of it had been plagiarized from internet sources that were not credited. Just how much of a laughing stock does Klein want to be? To defend an animal like Pinocher must raise questions in people's minds about the sanity and integrity of anyone who would do so. The act of tabling the essay was an immature grab for attention. Obviously, the idiot also knew he had plagiarized. Where is the man's brain ... assuming he has one, that is?
I just found this out. Have you heard about it? Apparently, in May, the Swediah army "lost" 3,199 pairs of green camouflage underpants! I kid thee not. You have to wonder about a couple of things here ... Exactly how were these items 'lost'? Were they stolen? I can't quite imagine a high black market demand for 'hot' camouflage drawers. I wonder what the going price is? Finally, the big question is, WHY does the underwear have to be camouflage? Is this for midnight manoeuvres?
Alberta premier Ralph Klein apparently launched into fervent defense of Augusto Pinochet recently in the legislature, and then tabled a university essay he had written about the Chilean. (What the hell was that about? Was he hoping the Speaker would put a little gold sticker on it, maybe?) Whatever, academics immediately crawled all over it and found that large parts of it had been plagiarized from internet sources that were not credited. Just how much of a laughing stock does Klein want to be? To defend an animal like Pinocher must raise questions in people's minds about the sanity and integrity of anyone who would do so. The act of tabling the essay was an immature grab for attention. Obviously, the idiot also knew he had plagiarized. Where is the man's brain ... assuming he has one, that is?
1 Comments:
1) The loss of camouflage underpants -- what I want to know is, was it male or female underwear? A bit of both? And I wonder if they're not being sold on eBay. Midnight 'manoeuvres' ... is there such a thing as 'womanoeuvres?'
2) Ralph Klein -- maybe we could convince George W. that Klein is a terrorist that way George W. could invade Klein and go searching in his brain for weapons of mass distruction. You think?
Post a Comment
<< Home